The Middle East Studies Association of North America
(MESA) is committed to defending academic freedom on the American campus.
As Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote in 1957, a free society
depends on free universities. Our members view with grave concern recent
efforts by some legislators, interest groups, partisan think tanks, media,
and individuals to interfere in university procedures with the object
of influencing who teaches and what is taught.
MESA's Committee on Academic Freedom (CAF)
has long been a champion for Middle East studies scholars world-wide. In 2005,
alarmed by threats to the free-flow of information and scholarship on the Middle
East, CAF inaugurated a new-sub committee devoted exclusively to the situation
of scholars and teachers located in North America (CAF-NA). The Academic
Freedom Fund was established to underwrite CAF-NA's activities that
alert both MESA members and the general public to these threats. Both groups
have a stake in countering efforts to undermine the independence of universities
and subordinate freedom of inquiry to the agendas of partisan or parochial
politics. [read more]
Threats to academic inquiry and academic independence
come in various forms. One form involves threats to, or attacks on, the
financial structures supporting Middle East studies. This includes threats
to withhold or condition Federal funding for university programs in area
studies and student language learning (Title VI of the Higher Education
Act) on political grounds [read
more]; efforts to intimidate private
foundation funding sources [read more]
and threats by individuals to withhold future donations to universities
[read more]. Another form involves
campaigns to harass individual academics and to discredit
their scholarship [read
more] because
of their actual or alleged political views. This has included accusations
of bias in
the classroom or intimidation of students [read
more], attacks on scholars for statements they made as private
individuals outside the classroom [read
more],
and just plain smear tactics. Young and untenured scholars are especially
vulnerable targets [read more read
more]. These attacks are generally
accompanied by accusations or insinuations that scholars and academic
programs are anti-American, unpatriotic, disloyal, anti-Semitic, or
are excessively sympathetic toward Arabs or Muslims. By advancing such
allegations,
outside individuals and organizations have attempted to insert themselves
into university governance, interfere with university policies and
procedures, undermine university traditions of open debate, and dictate
what goes
on in classrooms. Ironically, these efforts threaten to undermine the
very traditions of university autonomy, scholarly peer review and academic
freedom that have made the US system of higher education the envy of
the world and the backbone of our democratic system.
For an extensive reading list on this topic, please
go here.
|

Help us defend our subject and our universities by
donating to the Academic Freedom Fund. Your contributions will
support informational seminars for lawmakers, journalists, community
members
and university
officials; public relations efforts, informational materials and
advertisements. We aim to bring back fact and rational analysis to
discussions about
Middle East studies. |